Please visit the UOW Library support during COVID-19 page for up-to-date information regarding UOW Library services and facilities.
Here are some examples of tools you can use to develop, document and report on your systematic review:
Critical appraisal skills enable you to systematically assess the trustworthiness, relevance and results of published papers. The Centre for Evidence Based Medicine defines critical appraisal as the systematic evaluation of clinical research papers in order to establish:
A comprehensive set of critical appraisal tools can be found on the University of South Australia’s library guide.
JBI SUMARI facilitates the entire review process, from protocol development, team management, study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, data synthesis and writing your systematic review. This tool is developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI).
To set up a personal OVID account and access SUMARI as UOW staff or student, follow these instructions.
PROSPERO is an international register for prospective systematic literature reviews.
It includes protocol details for systematic reviews relevant to:
Protocols can include any type of any study design where there is a health-related outcome.
PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Use a framework like PICO when developing a good clinical research question:
|Patient or problem||Intervention||Comparison Intervention||Outcome|
|Describe the patient or group of patients of interest as accurately as possible||What is the main intervention or therapy you'll consider?||Is there an alternative treatment to compare?||What is the clinical outcome?|
The NHMRC states that risks of bias are the likelihood that features of the study design or conduct of the study will give misleading results. This can result in wasted resources, lost opportunities for effective interventions or harm to consumers.
See riskofbias.info for details of tools you can use to asses risk of bias, including:
The SPIDER question format was adapted from the PICO tool to search for qualitative and mixed-methods research. Questions based on this format identify the following concepts:
Example: What are young parents’ experiences of attending antenatal education?
|P of I||antenatal education|
|D||questionnaire, survey, interview, focus group, case study, or observational study
|R||qualitative or mixed method|
Search for (S AND P of I AND (D OR E) AND R) (Cooke, Smith, & Booth, 2012).