Some of the different characteristics of a systematic review and a literature review are outlined below:
| Systematic review | Literature review |
|---|---|
| High-level overview of primary research on a focused question that identifies, selects, synthesises, and appraises all high-quality research evidence relevant to that question | Qualitatively summarises evidence on a topic using informal or subjective methods to collect and interpret studies |
| Pre-specified eligibility or exclusion criteria | Pre-specified eligibility or exclusion criteria not necessary |
| Systematic, replicable, search strategy | Systematic, replicable, search strategy not necessary |
| More than one author | Commonly one author |
| Eliminating bias is a key intention | Summarising literature on a topic is the key intention |
| Takes months to years to complete | Takes weeks to months to complete |
The difference between a systematic review and a literature review. Covidence
Difference between a systematic review and a literature review. [figshare] Kysh, Lynn (2013):
On the lands that we study, we walk, and we live, we acknowledge and respect the traditional custodians and cultural knowledge holders of these lands.