(Title of Case, (Year) volume number, Abbreviated reference series, Starting page)
In the case of Mabo v. Queensland (no. 2) (1992) 175 CLR1, there a number of statements were read.
The case, Jones v. Sherlock (2009) NSWSC 246 showed that a number of inconsistencies were present.
In Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v. Harris (1997) 188 CLR 313 at 334 the High Court held that the landlord was in breach of a contractual duty of care owed to the tenants and to their family.
Direct quote
The judge in R v Ramage (2004) VSC 508 stated the "The Court cannot allow unannounced evidence".
For pinpoint references (also known as units of division) where only specific divisions of are intended to be cited, this in written as below:
Section 2 of Mabo v. Queensland (no. 2) …
Or
In ss. 2-5 of Mabo v. Queensland (no. 2) …
Or
In s. 2 of Mabo v. Queensland (no. 2) …
The abbreviations of s. for singular divisions or ss. for multiple division can be used in place of “Section” however, the abbreviations must not be used to start a sentence
Name of case (Year) Volume number, abbreviated reference series, Starting page.
R v. Ramage (2004) VSC 508.
Chappel v Hart (1998) HCA 55.
Mabo v. Queensland (no. 2) (1992) 175 CLR1.
Jones v. Sherlock (2009) NSWSC 246.
Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v. Harris (1997) 188 CLR 313.
On the lands that we study, we walk, and we live, we acknowledge and respect the traditional custodians and cultural knowledge holders of these lands.